This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wagman, J. Articles by Weneck, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wagman, J. Articles by Weneck, E. J. Agricola Articles by Wagman, J. Articles by Weneck, E. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1963 May; 11(3): 244-248

Preservation of Bacteria by Circulating-Gas Freeze Drying

U.S. Army Biological Laboratories, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland

ABSTRACT

Water-washed Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli were freeze dried in a circulating-gas system at atmospheric pressure. This convective procedure resulted in a substantially higher survival of organisms than could be obtained by the vacuum method of freeze drying. There was little or no decrease in cell viability during convective drying when the residual moisture content was 15% or higher. Below this level, survival declined with decreasing moisture content. A detailed comparison of the convective and vacuum methods indicated that the advantage gained by freeze drying bacteria in air accrues in the early period of sublimation, at which time cells were found to be sensitive to vacuum drying but insensitive to air drying. An explanation for this difference is proposed, based upon the kinetics of water removal in the two processes. In brief, it is suggested that the convective method permits samples to be dried more uniformly; and regional over-drying, which may be deleterious even if transient, is thus avoided in achieving the optimal level of moisture.