AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farkas-Himsley, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farkas-Himsley, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Farkas-Himsley, H.

Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1964 January; 12(1): 1-6
Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Killing of Chlorine-Resistant Bacteria by Chlorine-Bromine Solutions

H. Farkas-Himsley1

Department of Bacteriology, Hebrew University—Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel

ABSTRACT

The disinfective power of chlorine, bromine, and mixtures of chlorine and bromine at different ratios was compared. The influence of pH was also studied. The experiments were carried out in "purified" water and in natural waters of swimming pools, river, and sea. In the presence of high amounts of nitrogenous growth-promoting material (at neutral pH), bromine was more effective than chlorine; in waters containing low amounts of nitrogenous growth-promoting material, chlorine was found superior. Mixtures of chlorine and bromine at various ratios were found to increase in effectiveness inversely to the percentage of hypobromite generated, down to 10 or 5%. Such effectiveness was found at pH levels of 5.4 to 8.6 in both purified and natural water containing high and low amounts of nitrogenous growth-promoting material. Therefore, the above mixtures seem of practical value for the disinfection of various natural waters. Escherichia coli isolated in the presence of chlorine, either from swimming pools or after deliberate exposure to the halogen, were shown to be chlorine-resistant mutants. Their resistance was maintained for at least nine passages in the absence of the disinfectant, which accounts for the number of passages tested. Chlorine-resistant mutants were not affected by bromine alone but did show a marked sensitivity to low concentrations of bromine active in the presence of chlorine. This was achieved by admixing small amounts of bromide to hypochlorite. A hypothetical model is presented to explain the synergistic sequential block by the two disinfectants. Some chlorine-resistant mutants were found to have changed into relatively slow-growing organisms with a changed phase-sensitivity pattern.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Microbiology, School of Hygiene, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1964 January; 12(1): 1-6
Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1964 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.