AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toussaint, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Toussaint, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Toussaint, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. I.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1965 July; 13(4): 552-558
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Soluble Antigen Fluorescent-Antibody Technique

Andre J. Toussaint and Robert I. Anderson

Department of Serology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

ABSTRACT

An indirect fluorescent-antibody (FA) procedure employing soluble antigen fixed onto an artificial matrix was developed, and a mechanical means for reading of test results was devised. The method employs two small cellulose acetate paper discs for each test. One disc contains soluble antigen diluted in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA); the other contains only 1% BSA and serves as a control. After testing by the indirect FA procedure, the results of the tests are read on a fluorometer fitted with a paper chromatogram door. The instrument is set at zero with the control disc as a blank, and the specific fluorescence of the antigen disc is determined. Findings obtained with homologous and heterologous antisera indicated that the method yields excellent results. The soluble antigen fluorescent-antibody technique has definite advantages over the conventional indirect FA procedures. (i) The investigator may objectively select the antigen to be employed. (ii) It is possible to obtain objective mechanical reading of test results rather than the highly subjective readings required by conventional methods. (iii) The system compensates for any nonspecific fluorescence contributed either by the serum (e.g., drugs) or by free fluorescein in the conjugated antiserum.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1965 July; 13(4): 552-558
Copyright © 1965 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1965 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.