AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, L. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, L. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1966 November; 14(6): 940-952
Copyright © 1966 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Virustat, a Device for Continuous Production of Viruses

Homer Jacobson and Leslie S. Jacobson1

Department of Chemistry, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York
Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

ABSTRACT

Methods for continuous production of viruses, and operation of the virustat, an apparatus in which such production was accomplished, were studied. Continuous production requires a separate continuous host growth chamber, such as the chemostat, and a multiunit virus growth chamber into which the virus-inoculated host cells are led. Successful continuous output of MS-2 and {phi}X174 viruses, the latter in lysates, over periods of several days and at titers approximating those of batch lysates, was observed. Design problems include chamber sizes and flow rates, growth of resistant mutants within both virus and host growth chambers, clogging by lysis debris, and the phenomenon of self-inoculation. The latter represents virus growth in the first section of the chamber in excess of the washout rate, leading to lack of need for virus inoculation after an initial period. Use of the virustat for production and research purposes will require some attention to the formation of resistant bacterial colonies at pockets and surface sites of limited washout. With the virustat as a continuous virus production device, continuous purification methods are desirable. Research use of the virustat in continuous mutagenic population studies would require suppression of self-inoculation by use of many sections in the chamber, and improved servo control of host populations at low concentrations.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Biology, Long Island University, Brooklyn, N.Y.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1966 November; 14(6): 940-952
Copyright © 1966 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1966 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.