This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Portner, D. M. Articles by Hoffman, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Portner, D. M. Articles by Hoffman, R. K. Agricola Articles by Portner, D. M. Articles by Hoffman, R. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1967 July; 15(4): 800-807
Copyright © 1967 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Certification of Probability of Sterilization of Liquid by Filtration

Department of the Army, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21701

ABSTRACT

Four types of hydrosol filters, two reusable (diatomaceous cylinder and fritted-glass funnel) and two disposable (asbestos pad and membrane filter) were challenged with a heavy bacterial suspension to assess their ability to produce sterile filtrates. Two of the four diatomaceous earth filters, the four fritted-glass funnels, and all of the asbestos pads tested generally gave sterile filtrates. However, only one type of filter, one of the membranes in its manufacturer's own holder, consistently gave sterile filtrates. The two other types of membranes usually gave sterile filtrates if tested in one manufacturer's holder, but all types invariably gave contaminated filtrates when tested in another manufacturer's holder. Contaminated filtrates were generally attributed to a poor reusable filter or to a faulty holder used with a disposable filter. If a high degree of certainty is required for sterile heat-labile filtrate, it is suggested that the liquid be passed through two or more filters in a previously tested and proven system.