AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, L. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cook, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, L. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cook, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, L. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 December; 16(12): 1831-1840
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Variations in the Growth Response of Four Different Vitamin B12 Assay Microorganisms to the Same Tissue and Standard Preparations1

Elizabeth A. Cook and Lillian N. Ellis

Department of Bacteriology and Department of Chemistry, Douglass College, Rutgers, The State University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

ABSTRACT

Four microbiological assay procedures (Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus leichmanni, Euglena gracilis, and Ochromonas malhamensis) for the vitamin B12 content of rat liver and kidney tissue were compared. Significant differences in the growth response for portions of the same sample based on the same standard preparations were noted. The liver values with E. coli were strikingly higher than those obtained with the other microorganisms, about which there was rather general agreement. With kidney tissue, E. coli again gave higher values, but not as significantly high as those obtained with L. leichmannii and E. gracilis. O. malhamensis values were significantly lower. These differences were greater than were expected and could not be explained by the differences of specificity and sensitivity of the assay organisms. Several methods of sample preparation, the possible presence of an alkali-heat-stable factor, different methods of sterilization of the sample plus medium, and different chromatographic procedures were explored in an attempt to find explanations for the variations in growth response, with the thought that these various methods would clarify in what form or forms the free and bound vitamin B12 might exist in the samples. No clear-cut explanation was found.


FOOTNOTES

1 Presented in part at the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 3-7 May 1964.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 December; 16(12): 1831-1840
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.