AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zygmunt, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavormina, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zygmunt, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavormina, P. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zygmunt, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tavormina, P. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 August; 16(8): 1168-1173
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Susceptibility of Coagulase-negative Staphylococci to Lysostaphin and Other Antibiotics

Walter A. Zygmunt, Henry P. Browder and Peter A. Tavormina

Mead Johnson Research Center, Mead Johnson & Company, Evansville, Indiana 47721

ABSTRACT

In general, coagulase-negative staphylococci were found to be relatively less susceptible to the lytic action of lysostaphin than coagulase-positive staphylococci. To achieve, arbitrarily, a lysis greater than 75%, it was necessary to use an increased concentration of enzyme or a longer incubation period than that usually required with coagulase-positive strains. For the most part, the cultures studied were sensitive to oxacillin, cloxacillin, dicloxacillin, nafcillin, ancillin, cephalothin, cephaloridine, fusidic acid, lincomycin, novobiocin, and neomycin [median minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 1.56 µg/ml or less]. Some degree of resistance (median MIC values of 12.5 µg/ml or greater) to benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, methicillin, tetracycline, chloretetracycline, erythromycin, ristocetin, and lysostaphin was found. Ten methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococal strains were found to be cross-resistant to all nine of the penicillins tested, but much less resistant to the two cephalosporin analogues. In several instances, some of these strains seemed to be more sensitive to benzylpenicillin and to certain of the semisynthetic penicillins than to methicillin. Of the 18 antibiotics tested with the viable plate count method, the methicillin-resistant strains were found to be the most sensitive to lincomycin and novobiocin.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 August; 16(8): 1168-1173
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.