AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kato, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chibata, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kato, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chibata, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kato, J.
Right arrow Articles by Chibata, I.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 August; 16(8): 1200-1206
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Production of L-Proline by Kurthia catenaforma

Jyoji Kato, So Horie, Saburo Komatsubara, Masahiko Kisumi and Ichiro Chibata

Department of Applied Biochemistry, Chemical Research Laboratory, Tanabe Seiyaku Co. Ltd., Kashima-cho, Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka, Japan

ABSTRACT

A number of organisms were screened for their ability to produce L-proline. Kurthia catenaforma, which we recently isolated, was selected. A serine-requiring mutant, strain 45, produced about 1.5 times the amount of this amino acid that the parent strain did. In investigations of various media, it was found that approximately 30 ml of L-proline per ml was produced in shaken culture at 30 C in a medium containing glucose, urea, corn steep liquor, casein hydrolysate, L-aspartic acid, and inorganic salts. To study the effect of L-aspartic acid on the production of L-proline, various amino or organic acids were substituted for L-aspartic acid, and the changes during fermentation were investigated. L-Aspartic acid was not replaced by the compounds tested, and this acid appeared to increase growth during the later stages of fermentation with a concurrent increase in the production of L-proline.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 August; 16(8): 1200-1206
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.