AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 September; 16(9): 1383-1386
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Isolation of Shigellae

V. Comparison of Enrichment Broths with Stools

Welton I. Taylor and Dorothy Schelhart

West Suburban Hospital, Oak Park, Illinois 60302
Lafayette Medical Laboratory, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504

ABSTRACT

Many enteric media are more efficient for the detection of salmonellae than of shigellae. Comparisons of three enrichment broths and three plating media were made during analysis of 1,405 stool specimens to choose a combination of media which would enhance detection of shigellae as well. Gram-Negative (GN), Selenite, and Silliker's Broths were streaked to E M B, Salmonella-Shigella (SS), and xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) Agars. The enrichment broths produced a twofold increase in isolations of both salmonellae and shigellae over direct streaking. All three broths performed equally well for Salmonella detection, but GN and Silliker's produced twice as many Shigella isolates as did Selenite. Comparison of the plating media showed that XLD was markedly more efficient than either E M B or SS Agar for the recovery of both genera. SS Agar was superior to E M B for isolation of salmonellae after enrichment, whereas E M B was better for isolation of shigellae by direct streaking. Both E M B and SS were more effective when used after GN and Silliker's than after Selenite. GN Broth and XLD Agar were the most efficient combination of media. During these analyses, 158 salmonellae and 49 shigellae isolates were obtained.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1968 September; 16(9): 1383-1386
Copyright © 1968 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1968 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.