AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Aranki, A.
Right arrow Articles by Freter, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 April; 17(4): 568-576
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Isolation of Anaerobic Bacteria from Human Gingiva and Mouse Cecum by Means of a Simplified Glove Box Procedure1

Alexander Aranki2, Salam A. Syed, Ernest B. Kenney and Rolf Freter

a Department of Microbiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

ABSTRACT

An anaerobic glove box constructed of clear flexible vinyl plastic is described. It is sufficiently inexpensive and simple in operation to be used not only in research but also in a clinical laboratory by technicians without special training. Conventional bacteriological techniques may be used inside the glove box for culturing and transferring anaerobic bacteria. The box may be heated to 37 C and thus serve as an anaerobic incubator as well, permitting inspection of cultures at any time. Media may be prepared and agar plates may be poured on the laboratory bench in the conventional manner. An overlay of trace amounts of palladium black catalyst over plated agar media reduces the medium to an oxidation-reduction (O-R) potential of - 300 mv within 2 days after introduction into the glove box. In spite of its greater simplicity, the system matched or excelled the roll tube method with respect to all parameters tested, including O-R potential obtainable in the media, O2 concentration in the gas phase, and efficiency in isolating anaerobic bacteria from the mouse cecum. Comparative studies indicate that the conventional anaerobic jar method was inadequate for the isolation of strict anaerobes from human gingival specimens and from the mouse cecum. This was due to the exposure of specimens and media to air during plating on the open laboratory bench. Anaerobic jars were adequate for maintaining the proper conditions for growth of anaerobic bacteria once these had been established in the glove box.


FOOTNOTES

2 Present address: Escuela Dental, Laboratorio Microbiologia, Avenida Santa Maria 571, Santiago, Chile.

1 A preliminary account of this study was given earlier (Bacteriol. Proc., p. 94, 1968).


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 April; 17(4): 568-576
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1969 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.