AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schelhart, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 September; 18(3): 393-395
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Isolation of Shigellae. VII. Comparison of Gram-Negative Broth with Rappaport's Enrichment Broth

Welton I. Taylor and Dorothy Schelhart

1 Lafayette Medical Laboratory, Lafayette, Louisiana 70501

ABSTRACT

Efficacies of Gram Negative Broth (GN) and Rappaport's Enrichment Broth (RE) were compared for detection of enteric pathogens from clinical specimens. Whereas direct streaking on four plating media found 57% of the salmonellae, GN found 80% and RE found 92% of the 157 isolates. By contrast, direct streaking found 87% of the shigellae whereas GN detected 93%, but RE found only 20%. RE produced 35% more Salmonella-positive plates than GN did, which resulted in a 15% increase in isolates. Statistically, RE proved to be significantly better than GN. The unsuitability of RE for shigellae, however, dictates that, if only one enrichment broth is to be used, GN must be that choice, but that maximal isolations of all enteric pathogens should result from the use of both RE and GN. Of the four plating media, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate Agar detected 90% of the salmonellae and 85% of the shigellae. Salmonella-Shigella Agar detected 72 and 43%, respectively, and Levine Eosin Methylene Blue Agar found 45 and 55%. Bismuth Sulfite Agar detected only 22% of the salmonellae and found no shigellae. The performance of all of the plating media was enhanced by enrichment, but RE was especially effective for salmonellae when compared to GN.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 September; 18(3): 393-395
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1969 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.