AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fedorko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Allnoch, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fedorko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Allnoch, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fedorko, J.
Right arrow Articles by Allnoch, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 November; 18(5): 869-873
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activity of Coumermycin A1

Joseph Fedorko, Sol Katz and Hedi Allnoch

Bacteriology Research Laboratory, Veterans Administration Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20422

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activity of coumermycin A1 was compared with that of novobiocin, ampicillin, and minocycline. Coumermycin was found to be the most active antibiotic of the four against Staphylococcus aureus. It was about 50 times more active than novobiocin or minocycline against the strains tested. Coumermycin also showed good activity against group A streptococci and pneumococci, moderate activity against Escherichia coli, indole-positive Proteus species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and poor activity against Klebsiella-Enterobacter and enterococci. Against P. mirabilis, however, coumermycin activity was almost equal to that of ampicillin. The new antibiotic was further found to be greatly reduced in activity in the presence of plasma, but its minimal inhibitory concentration was not greatly affected by inoculum size. Coumermycin was found to be bacteriostatic in its action, and resistance to it developed slowly. Also, cross-resistance was present with novobiocin but absent with ampicillin or minocycline.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1969 November; 18(5): 869-873
Copyright © 1969 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1969 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.