AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenters, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tolkacz, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fenters, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tolkacz, V. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fenters, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Tolkacz, V. K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 October; 20(4): 544-550
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Enhanced Immunogenicity in Mice of a Purified, Tween-Ether-Treated Influenza Vaccine

James D. Fenters, Herbert M. Yamashiroya, Robert F. Petzold and Vivian K. Tolkacz

Life Sciences Division, IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois 60616

ABSTRACT

The immunogenic response of mice vaccinated intranasally or subcutaneously with increasing doses of a purified, concentrated intact A2/Taiwan influenza vaccine or its Tween-ether derived vaccines was compared. Immunogenicity was measured by serum neutralization and hemagglutination-inhibition antibodies, lung lesions scores, and protection against respiratory challenge with live airborne influenza virus. Intact (untreated) vaccine, Tween-ether-treated (ET) vaccine, and the isolated hemagglutinins (HA) provided protection and stimulated homologous antibody response at the 35- and 70-chicken cell agglutination (CCA) unit level. At a lower dosage level, the vaccines administered by the subcutaneous route appeared to confer better protection. The ET vaccine was superior to intact virus or HA vaccines when administered subcutaneously. The minimum amount of the HA and intact vaccine given subcutaneously that protected mice against respiratory challenge was 7 CCA units (3.5 units injected twice) compared to 0.7 CCA units (0.35 units injected twice) for the ET vaccine. No heterologous antibody to the A/PR/8/34 or B/Mass/3/66 was noted. Low-level serum-neutralizing antibody was found against the A2/Japan/170 strain but, despite high levels of homologous A2/Taiwan/64 antibody, no cross-reactivity was found with the recent A2/Hong Kong/68 variant.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1970 October; 20(4): 544-550
Copyright © 1970 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1970 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.