This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Brien, T. C. Articles by Tauraso, N. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by O'Brien, T. C. Articles by Tauraso, N. M. Agricola Articles by O'Brien, T. C. Articles by Tauraso, N. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 February; 21(2): 311-315
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Statistical Evaluation of Diluents and Automatic Diluting and Pipetting Machines in Influenza Serology

Laboratory of Virology and Rickettsiology, and Biometrics Section, Division of Biologics Standards, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

ABSTRACT

The use of three diluents (i.e., 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline, PBS; PBS with 0.2% gelatin, PBS/GEL; and PBS with 0.4% bovine plasma albumin) and three methods (i.e., the standard tube macro-procedure, TUBE; the manual microtechnique, MANUAL; and the semiautomatic microtechnique, AUTO) were statistically compared for their reproducibility and sensitivity in determining hemagglutinin (HA) and hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titers. In the HA test, analyses of between-cell variances of the different methods showed the AUTO microtiter procedure to be more reproducible than the standard TUBE method. The MANUAL microtiter procedure was the least reproducible. In the HI test, the TUBE method was the most reproducible. No significant difference in the reproducibility of the diluents was observed in either the HA or HI test. When a comparison of the sensitivity of test methods and diluents was made for determining HA titers, the AUTO microtiter procedure and PBS/GEL diluent appeared to be the method and diluent of choice. Evaluation of another instrument, the autopipetter, which standardizes the volume of diluent to be added in the microtechnique, suggests that the reproducibility of the AUTO microtiter procedure might be further increased.