This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartlett, R. C. Articles by Mazens, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bartlett, R. C. Articles by Mazens, M. F. Agricola Articles by Bartlett, R. C. Articles by Mazens, M. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 September; 22(3): 372-376
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Plate Size and Location of Disc on Zone Diameter in the Disc Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test

Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut 06115

ABSTRACT

An established standard antimicrobial disc susceptibility test recommends the use of a 150-mm petri dish. Many workers substitute 100-mm plates and use various types of mechanical dispensers. A comparison of zone diameters was made by testing Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli against penicillin and chloramphenicol with the use of these different sized plates and dispensers. Zone diameters were consistently smaller at the edges of plates than in the center (0.4 to 1.2 mm). Significant small differences of up to 1.2 mm or no differences were observed when the mean diameters from these various plates were compared. All of the zone diameter measurements fell within accepted values for analytical variability in this procedure. There is no evidence that any individual combination of plates, dispensers, or disc locations provides greater precision in zone diameter measurement. More difficulty was encountered in measuring zones at the periphery of small plates. This suggests that busy clinical laboratory workers might not produce work of comparable quality with the smaller plates.