AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elston, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaab, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elston, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaab, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elston, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Schaab, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 September; 22(3): 408-414
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Multi-Biochemical Test System for Distinguishing Enteric and Other Gram-Negative Bacilli

Harry R. Elston, Judith A. Baudo, Joann P. Stanek and Mercedes Schaab

Microbiology Research Laboratory, Veterans Administration Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68105

ABSTRACT

A multi-biochemical test system consisting of nine tests, entitled Enterotube, was evaluated in parallel with conventional tests to determine its value in the identification of enteric and certain other gram-negative bacilli. The 242 bacterial strains studied were from a variety of pathological specimens and from our culture collection. When the results with individual tests represented in both test systems were compared, no discrepancies were noted in the indole test, and one discrepancy was recorded for dextrose. In 7 of 242 hydrogen sulfide tests, 3 of 242 phenylalanine tests, 22 of 242 urease tests, 15 of 242 dulcitol tests, 12 of 242 lactose tests, 27 of 217 lysine decarboxylase tests, and 5 of 242 citrate tests, the Enterotube results were contrary to those obtained with conventional methods. The lysine decarboxylase test in the Enterotube posed a problem of interpretation and readability and is not an acceptable alternative to the conventional methods. Fifteen of the strains studied were incorrectly identified by the Enterotube system and four could not be differentiated from other closely related strains. Salmonella could be identified as to group, whereas Shigella strains were frequently misidentified as Escherichia. The Enterotube method is simple and convenient, and all media are inoculated at once from a single colony.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1971 September; 22(3): 408-414
Copyright © 1971 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1971 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.