AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carson, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, N. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carson, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, N. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1972 May; 23(5): 863-869
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Factors Affecting Comparative Resistance of Naturally Occurring and Subcultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Disinfectants

L. A. Carson, M. S. Favero, W. W. Bond and N. J. Petersen

1 Applied Microbiology and Planetary Quarantine Section, Phoenix Laboratories, Center for Disease Control, Phoenix, Arizona 85014

ABSTRACT

A strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated in pure culture from the reservoir of a hospital mist therapy unit by an extinction-dilution technique; its natural distilled water environment was used as a growth and maintenance medium. After a single subculture on Trypticase soy agar, the strain showed a marked decrease in resistance to inactivation by acetic acid, glutaraldehyde, chlorine dioxide, and a quaternary ammonium compound when compared with naturally occurring cells grown in mist therapy unit water. The following factors were observed to affect the relative resistances of naturally occurring and subcultured cells of the P. aeruginosa strain: (i) temperature at which the cultures were incubated prior to exposure to disinfectants, (ii) growth phase of the cultures at the time of exposure to disinfectants, (iii) nature of the suspending menstruum for disinfectants, and (iv) exposure to fluorescent light during incubation of inocula prior to testing. The applied significance of these findings may alter the present concepts of disinfectant testing as well as routine control procedures in the hospital environment.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1972 May; 23(5): 863-869
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.