This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, T. K. Articles by Becker, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lee, T. K. Articles by Becker, M. E. Agricola Articles by Lee, T. K. Articles by Becker, M. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1972 November; 24(5): 714-716
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Validity of Spinal Cord Examination as a Substitute Procedure for Routine Rabies Diagnosis

¹ Division of Virology, Bureau of Laboratories, Michigan Department of Public Health, Lansing, Michigan 48914

ABSTRACT

A significant portion of specimens received by this laboratory for rabies diagnosis is unsatisfactory for testing due to decomposition of the brain, or severe mutilation of the head when the animal was killed. Examination of the spinal cord was therefore explored as a possible alternative method when standard brain examination was not possible. In this study, both brain and spinal cord of 248 rabies-suspect animals were examined to assess the reliability of the spinal cord method. Brain and spinal cord of the 248 animals were examined by fluorescent antibody (FA) method, and mouse inoculation tests were performed on 247 brain specimens and 13 spinal cord specimens. By using both brain and spinal cord, 30 animals representing 8 species were diagnosed as rabid by FA, and 218, representing 11 species, were negative. There was 100% agreement between two procedures with FA as the criterion. This study showed that in cases where the usual examination is precluded due to brain destruction, the spinal cord procedure offers an equally reliable alternate method of diagnosis.