AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saymen, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Macmillan, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Saymen, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Macmillan, B. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Saymen, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Macmillan, B. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1973 June; 25(6): 921-934
Copyright © 1973 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Control of Surface Wound Infection: Skin Versus Synthetic Grafts

Dennis G. Saymen, Paul Nathan, Ian Alan Holder, Edward O. Hill and Bruce G. Macmillan

Department of Physiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Department of Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Shriner's Burns Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

ABSTRACT

Auto-, iso-, or xenografts of skin and synthetics placed on surface wounds freshly contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa stabilizes the wound bacterial population in rats over a 24-h period. When these wounds contained a bacterial contamination established for 24 h prior to grafting, only skin and the synthetic polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate were effective in lowering the initial bacterial concentration. Polyurethane foam and nylon velour were not effective in the established infection model. Skin placed on a contaminated wound for 2 h or longer appeared to equilibrate with the underlying muscle so that the bacterial count per milligram of skin was similar to that of the muscle. It was suggested that this preparation would be useful to obtain an estimate of surface contamination without biopsy of the infected muscle. Skin grafts in place for 2 h significantly lowered the bacterial count in a wound with an established infection. A second decrease occurred between 4 and 24 h after grafting. Histological studies of contaminated and exposed panniculus muscle showed that leukocytes tend to migrate from the muscle surface to its base. Skin grafts and polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate appear to reverse the white cell migration so that the cells move toward the surface of the muscle with preservation of normal staining characteristics in the muscle. It is suggested that this alteration in cell movement after graft application might modify the white cell function and result in a greater bactericidal activity. Apparently, grafts lower bacterial levels in an established infection by modifying the host response to the surface contamination.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1973 June; 25(6): 921-934
Copyright © 1973 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1973 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.