AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGarrity, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Coriell, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGarrity, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Coriell, L. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McGarrity, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Coriell, L. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1973 August; 26(2): 167-172
Copyright © 1973 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mass Airflow Cabinet for Control of Airborne Infection of Laboratory Rodents

Gerard J. McGarrity and Lewis L. Coriell

1 Department of Microbiology, Institute for Medical Research, Camden, New Jersey 08103

ABSTRACT

A mass airflow cabinet for handling and housing of laboratory rodents has been developed and tested. The unit consists of a high-efficiency particulate air filter and uniform distribution of air at a vertical velocity of 19 cm per s. Animals are maintained without bedding in mesh-bottomed cages that rest on rollers for rotation inside the cabinet. There is an air barrier of 90 cm per s separating the cabinet air from room air. Sampling for airborne bacteria yielded an average of 0.03 colony-forming units (CFU) per ft3 of air inside the cabinet, whereas 28.8 CFU per ft3 was simultaneously detected outside the cabinet during housekeeping, a reduction of almost three logs. The efficiency of the air barrier was tested by aerosolization of T3 phage. When phage was aerosolized 5 cm outside the cabinet, no phage could be detected 5 cm inside when the fans were operating; with the fans off an average of 1.6 x 104 plaque-forming units (PFU) per ft3 was detected in six tests. Aerosolization of phage inside the cabinet yielded an average of 9 x 10 PFU per ft3 outside; an average of 4.1 x 106 PFU per ft3 were detected with the fans not in operation, a reduction of more than four logs. In-use studies on effectiveness showed that the cabinet significantly reduced the incidence of mice originally titer-free to Reo-3 virus. Hemagglutination inhibition antibodies to Reo-3 were detected in 9/22 (42%) mice housed in a conventionally ventilated animal laboratory while no seroconversion was detected in any of 22 mice housed in the mass air flow cabinet in the same laboratory.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1973 August; 26(2): 167-172
Copyright © 1973 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1973 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.