AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salanitro, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Zgornicki, Y. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Salanitro, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Zgornicki, Y. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Salanitro, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Zgornicki, Y. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1974 April; 27(4): 678-687
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Isolation, Culture Characteristics, and Identification of Anaerobic Bacteria from the Chicken Cecum

J. P. Salanitro, I. G. Fairchilds and Y. D. Zgornicki

Department of Animal Physiology and Growth, Shell Development Company, Biological Sciences Research Center, Modesto, California 95352

ABSTRACT

Studies on the anaerobic cecal microflora of the 5-week-old chicken were made to determine a suitable roll-tube medium for enumeration and isolation of the bacterial population, to determine effects of medium components on recovery of total anaerobes, and to identify the predominant bacterial groups. The total number of microorganisms in cecal contents determined by direct microscope cell counts varied (among six samples) from 3.83 x 1010 to 7.64 x 1010 per g. Comparison of different nonselective media indicated that 60% of the direct microscope count could be recovered with a rumen fluid medium (M98-5) and 45% with medium 10. Deletion of rumen fluid from M98-5 reduced the total anaerobic count by half. Colony counts were lower if chicken cecal extract was substituted for rumen fluid in M98-5. Supplementing medium 10 with liver, chicken fecal, or cecal extracts improved recovery of anaerobes slightly. Prereduced blood agar media were inferior to M98-5. At least 11 groups of bacteria were isolated from high dilutions (10-9) of cecal material. Data on morphology and physiological and fermentation characteristics of 90% of the 298 isolated strains indicated that these bacteria represented species of anaerobic gram-negative cocci, facultatively anaerobic cocci and streptococci, Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium, Eubacterium, Bacteroides, and Clostridium. The growth of many of these strains was enhanced by rumen fluid, yeast extract, and cecal extract additions to basal media. These studies indicate that some of the more numerous anaerobic bacteria present in chicken cecal digesta can be isolated and cultured when media and methods that have been developed for ruminal bacteria are employed.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1974 April; 27(4): 678-687
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.