AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutka, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dutka, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dutka, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1974 September; 28(3): 474-480
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Autoclave and Ethylene Oxide-Sterilized Membrane Filters Used in Water Quality Studies

B. J. Dutka, M. J. Jackson1 and J. B. Bell

Microbiology Laboratories, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario, and Gelman Instrument Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

ABSTRACT

Autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters manufactured by Gelman, Millipore, and Sartorius were field tested for their recovery of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, fecal streptococci, and heterotrophs. The data were analyzed by using split-plot analysis of variance and significance tests. Membranes were also tested for pH and toxicity using Escherichia coli. The mean data summaries indicated that Gelman membrane filters generally produced the highest counts during the field studies. Statistical analyses of the March data showed that there were significant differences between membrane filters at 1% level; however, statistical analyses of June data revealed no significant differences except in total coliform recoveries. Toxicity tests at 35 C indicated that Gelman and Millipore autoclaved membrane filters were able to recover 92% of the test organisms. Toxicity tests performed at 44.5 C revealed that no membranes were able to recover more than 40% of the test organisms. Since differences were found in the ability of the three brands of membrane filters to recover bacteria from natural and controlled sources, membrane filters from different manufacturers cannot be readily interchanged. There is a need for a standardized procedure for testing bacterial recovery by membrane filters.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Microbe One, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48104.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1974 September; 28(3): 474-480
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.