AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thore, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lundin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thore, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lundin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Thore, A.

Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1975 November; 30(5): 713-721
Copyright © 1975 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Methods for Extraction of Bacterial Adenine Nucleotides Determined by Firefly Assay

Arne Lundin and Anders Thore

National Defence Research Institute, Department 4, S-172 04 Sundbyberg, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Adenine nucleotides in Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were extracted using 10 different methods. Extracts were assayed for adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) by the firefly method using an improved procedure. Analytical interference by bacterial enzymes not inactivated during the extraction was found to be a major problem. However, these enzymes were inactivated to a considerable extent by the inclusion of ethylenediaminetetraacetate in the extraction reagent. The 10 extraction methods were compared with respect to yield of adenine nucleotides, interference with the enzymic assay, reproducibility of the method, and stability of the extracts. Results indicated that extraction with trichloroacetic acid was the method most closely reflecting actual levels of ATP, ADP, and AMP in intact bacterial cells. However, for the extraction of ATP in some bacterial strains several other methods may be used and may be advantageous from a practical point of view.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1975 November; 30(5): 713-721
Copyright © 1975 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.