AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chesbro, W
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, G J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chesbro, W
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, G J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chesbro, W
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, G J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 April; 31(4): 581-589

Heterogeneity of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B as a function of growth stage: implications for surveillance of foods.

W Chesbro, D Carpenter and G J Silverman

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus was grown in a fermentor under controlled conditions of pH, oxygenation, and temperature, while the higher-molecular-weight products of its growth were continuously removed across ultrafiltration membranes. These products were examined by single and double gel diffusion and immunoelectrophoresis against a variety of available anti-enterotoxin B antisera. All antisera examined were polyvalent for S. aureus antigens. However, two electrophoretically distinct proteins were the major reactants with the antisera. One of these was present in early- to mid-log-phase cultures. After mid-log growth was achieved, both were present but in continuously changing proportions. This observation was repeated with a variety of growth conditions and media. A significant part of the physicochemical heterogeneity of enterotoxin B observed over the past 20 years is thus correlated with the growth phase of the organism. Taken together, these facts are used to argue for a two-step rationale for the detection of food-borne staphylococcal disease: (i) screening for a presumptive hazard by analysis for any antigen, toxin, or enzyme of S. aureus in a foodstuff and (ii) confirmation of the hazard by identifying the presence of an enterotoxin using a combination of physicochemical and serological techniques.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 April; 31(4): 581-589







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.