This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E., Jr.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Casida, L. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 May; 39(5): 1035-1041

Bacterial Predators of Micrococcus luteus in Soil {dagger}

L. E. Casida Jr.

1 Department of Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

ABSTRACT

Micrococcus luteus cells died relatively rapidly when they were added to natural soil. Microscopic observation showed that the cells were being physically destroyed by bacterial predators in the soil. Two of these predators were responsible for the initial, main attack, and they were isolated. The isolates on laboratory media lysed M. luteus cells in a manner similar to the attacks that occurred in soil. Neither predator was obligate, however, nor were they nutritionally fastidious. One of these bacteria produced mycelium and conidia. Under nutritionally poor conditions it used slender filaments of mycelium to seek out host cells. It had at least some of the characteristics of a Streptoverticillium species. The other bacterium was a short, gram-negative rod that did not easily fit into any of the known groups of gram-negative bacteria. It attached to host cells, but its mechanism of lysing these cells is not known.


FOOTNOTES

{dagger} Paper no. 5880 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agriculture Experiment Station.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 May; 39(5): 1035-1041




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Falkinham, J. O. III, Wall, T. E., Tanner, J. R., Tawaha, K., Alali, F. Q., Li, C., Oberlies, N. H. (2009). Proliferation of Antibiotic-Producing Bacteria and Concomitant Antibiotic Production as the Basis for the Antibiotic Activity of Jordan's Red Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2735-2741 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pham, V. D., Shebelut, C. W., Diodati, M. E., Bull, C. T., Singer, M. (2005). Mutations affecting predation ability of the soil bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Microbiology 151: 1865-1874 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Willems, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Munoz-Adelantado, E., Goris, J., De Vos, P., Martinez-Romero, E., Toro, N., Gillis, M. (2003). Description of new Ensifer strains from nodules and proposal to transfer Ensifer adhaerens Casida 1982 to Sinorhizobium as Sinorhizobium adhaerens comb. nov. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53: 1207-1217 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rogel, M. A., Hernandez-Lucas, I., Kuykendall, L. D., Balkwill, D. L., Martinez-Romero, E. (2001). Nitrogen-Fixing Nodules with Ensifer adhaerens Harboring Rhizobium tropici Symbiotic Plasmids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3264-3268 [Abstract] [Full Text]