AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chynoweth, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chynoweth, D. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chynoweth, D. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 August; 40(2): 287-293

Comparison of In Situ and In Vitro Rates of Methane Release in Freshwater Sediments

C. A. Kelly{dagger} and D. P. Chynoweth{ddagger}

1 Department of Environmental and Industrial Health, School of Public Health, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

ABSTRACT

Anaerobic lake sediment incubated in vitro was investigated for its ability to mimic natural in situ sediment activities, using rate of methane production for the comparison. Two lakes with different rates and seasonal patterns of methanogenic activity were compared. There was good agreement (at the 97.5% confidence level) between rates of in situ methane release and initial (lasting an average of 120 h) rates of production measured in vitro in surface (0- to 3-cm) sediment. Evidence from this study, and others, indicated that it is the in situ surface sediment methane production which is primarily responsible for maintaining in situ methane release, and thus the above agreement was what was expected if surface in situ activity was maintained in vitro. When deeper sediment was investigated, however, the sum of in vitro rates from 0 to 20 cm (measured in 1.5- to 3-cm intervals) was much higher than in situ release rates and would have resulted in an impossibly high volume of gas. The extra gas could not have been stored within the sediments. We conclude that the in situ methanogenic activity of the 0- to 3-cm anaerobic surface sediments could be preserved during removal and laboratory incubation. However, similar treatment of deeper sediment appeared to stimulate methanogenic activity.


FOOTNOTES

{dagger} Present address: Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N6.

{ddagger} Present address: Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL 60616.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 August; 40(2): 287-293







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.