AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKinley, G A
Right arrow Articles by Rollins, L D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKinley, G A
Right arrow Articles by Rollins, L D
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McKinley, G A
Right arrow Articles by Rollins, L D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 September; 40(3): 562-566

Incidence of salmonellae in fecal samples of production swine and swine at slaughter plants in the United States in 1978.

G A McKinley, D J Fagerberg, C L Quarles, B A George, D E Wagner and L D Rollins

ABSTRACT

Nine swine slaughter plants and 19 swine production units were randomly selected for sampling from the six highest swine-producing states representing a total of 64% of the United States swine production. Three composites of 10 fresh swine fecal samples were obtained from each slaughter plant, representing three different farm sources of swine. Two composite fecal samples were collected from two different production pens from each production unit. Samples were analyzed for salmonellae. Isolated salmonellae were biochemically and serologically identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility and resistance transfer ability. Salmonellae were recovered from swine at seven of the nine slaughter plants and 16 of the 27 composites of slaughter swine. Of the 19 production units, 3 had swine shedding salmonellae. Resistances found included streptomycin, tetracycline, and sulfadiazine. Of the 52 total isolates tested, 71% had some level of antibiotic resistance. Only 3 of 37 resistant isolated could transfer resistance under the conditions used.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 September; 40(3): 562-566







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.