AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newell, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newell, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Newell, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 July; 42(1): 23-31

Frequency of Dividing Cells as an Estimator of Bacterial Productivity {dagger}

Steven Y. Newell and Robert R. Christian{ddagger}

1 University of Georgia Marine Institute, Sapelo Island, Georgia 31327

ABSTRACT

It has recently been proposed that the frequency of dividing bacterial cells (FDC) can be used to predict growth rates of natural aquatic bacterial assemblages. We have examined the relationship between FDC and growth rate in bacteria from southern-temperate, coastal marine waters by using incubation under conditions of manipulated nutrient availability and exclusion of bacterivores. The regression of the natural logarithm of bacterial instantaneous growth rate (µ) on FDC resulted in a better fit than regression of untransformed µ on FDC. The regression equation was ln µ = 0.299FDC – 4.961. The coefficient of variation for predicted ln µ at mean FDC was 7%. The range of FDC-estimated bacterial instantaneous generation times for coastal Georgia waters was 12 to 68 h, and range of calculated bacterial production rates was 0.6 to 17.6 mg of C·m–3· h–1. Unresolved problems of and suggested improvements on the FDC method of predicting growth rate are discussed.


FOOTNOTES

{ddagger} Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

{dagger} Contribution no. 429 from the University of Georgia Marine Institute.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 July; 42(1): 23-31




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.