AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartley, T D
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, S M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartley, T D
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, S M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bartley, T D
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, S M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 April; 43(4): 829-834

Membrane filter technique for the isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica.

T D Bartley, T J Quan, M T Collins and S M Morrison

ABSTRACT

A membrane filter procedure was developed for the isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from aquatic environments. Primary differentiation was based on the fermentation of sorbitol, the absence of lysine decarboxylase and arginine decarboxylase-dihydrolase activities, and the production of urease. Sodium deoxycholate was incorporated as an inhibitor of background organisms. The presumptive identification of Y. enterocolitica was accomplished in 50 h, and the rate of identity confirmation of typical colonies was 88%. The mean recovery rate of 15 strains from phosphate buffer suspensions was 91%, and quantitative recovery was demonstrated for low populations of the organism in both laboratory-prepared and naturally occurring mixed cultures. The technique was used to isolate 33 strains of Y. enterocolitica from 15 of 27 river water samples and from prechlorinated sewage effluent. Nine (27%) of the isolates were rhamnose positive, and only five (15%) were serotypable. Two isolates were identified as serotype O:4 (or O:4,32), two were O:17, and the fifth was O:40.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 April; 43(4): 829-834







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.