AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macy, J M
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macy, J M
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, L
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Macy, J M
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 December; 44(6): 1428-1434

Cellulolytic and non-cellulolytic bacteria in rat gastrointestinal tracts.

J M Macy, J R Farrand and L Montgomery

ABSTRACT

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species were the predominant organisms isolated from small intestinal (jejunal) contents of rats, and lactic acid was the only organic acid detected. The numbers of cellulolytic bacteria in small intestines were low (approximately 10(3)/g). The fermentation in ceca was different from that in intestines, as, in addition to small amounts of lactic acid, high concentrations of volatile fatty acids were detected. The mixed cecal microflora was able to digest cellulose (pebble-milled Whatman no. 1) and cabbage. High numbers of cellulolytic bacteria were found (0.5 X 10(8) to 12.2 X 10(8)/g; 6% of total viable bacteria). The predominant celluloytic organism isolated was Bacteroides succinogenes. Ruminococcus flavifaciens was isolated from a few animals. The kinds and numbers of the predominant non-cellulolytic organisms isolated from rat ceca were similar to those described by previous workers.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 December; 44(6): 1428-1434




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.