This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lovell, C. R. Articles by Konopka, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lovell, C. R. Articles by Konopka, A. Agricola Articles by Lovell, C. R. Articles by Konopka, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 March; 49(3): 485-491
Copyright © 1985, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Primary and Bacterial Production in Two Dimictic Indiana Lakes

Charles R. Lovell^,* and Allan Konopka

Department of Biological Sciences, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

ABSTRACT

The relationship between primary and bacterial production in two dimictic Indiana lakes with different primary productivities was examined during the summer stratification period in 1982. Primary production rates were calculated from rates of H¹⁴CO₃^– incorporation by natural samples, and bacterial production was calculated from rates of [³H-methyl]thymidine incorporation by natural samples. Both vertical and seasonal distributions of bacterial production in the more productive lake (Little Crooked Lake) were strongly influenced by primary production. A lag of about 2 weeks between a burst in primary production and the subsequent response in bacterial production was observed. The vertical distribution of bacterial production in the water column of the less productive lake (Crooked Lake) was determined by the vertical distribution of primary production, but no clear relationship between seasonal maxima of primary and bacterial production in this lake was observed. High rates of bacterial production in Crooked Lake during May indicate the importance of allochthonous carbon washed in by spring rains. Bacterial production accounted for 30.6 and 31.8% of total (primary plus bacterial) production in Crooked Lake and Little Crooked Lake, respectively, from April through October. High rates of bacterial production during late September and October were observed in both lakes. Calculation of the fraction of bacterial production supported by phytoplankton excretion implies an important role for other mechanisms of supplying carbon, such as phytoplankton autolysis. Several factors affecting the calculation of bacterial production from the thymidine incorporation rates in these lakes were examined.

^* Corresponding author.

Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.