This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosef, O
Right arrow Articles by Gondrosen, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosef, O
Right arrow Articles by Gondrosen, B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rosef, O
Right arrow Articles by Gondrosen, B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 June; 49(6): 1507-1510

Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter laridis from domestic and wild animals.

O Rosef, G Kapperud, S Lauwers and B Gondrosen

ABSTRACT

By using 50 unabsorbed antisera, we were able to serotype 272 (65.7%) of 414 thermotolerant campylobacters from wild and domestic animals, on the basis of heat-stable antigens identified by means of passive hemagglutination. Forty-two serotypes were recognized. The pattern of serotypes detected in the various animal species was compared to human clinical isolates by using the Czekanowski index (proportional similarity index). The highest degree of similarity to the clinical isolates was observed for the poultry isolates, followed by strains from wild birds, flies, and pigs (in order of decreasing similarity). The serotypes recovered most frequently from poultry (LAU 1 and LAU 2) were also most prevalent in Norwegian patients. In contrast, serotype LAU 35/44, the predominant porcine serotype, was never recovered from human clinical specimens. Flies captured in chicken farms and in piggeries harbored serotypes which were also commonly seen in chickens and pigs, respectively. Nine of the strains included in this study could not be ascribed to any defined species. All of these were resistant to nalidixic acid and did not produce H2S.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 June; 49(6): 1507-1510




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • De Cesare, A., Parisi, A., Bondioli, V., Normanno, G., Manfreda, G. (2008). Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity Within Three Campylobacter Populations Isolated from Broiler Ceca and Carcasses. Poult. Sci. 87: 2152-2159 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fitch, B. R., Sachen, K. L., Wilder, S. R., Burg, M. A., Lacher, D. W., Khalife, W. T., Whittam, T. S., Young, V. B. (2005). Genetic Diversity of Campylobacter sp. Isolates from Retail Chicken Products and Humans with Gastroenteritis in Central Michigan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4221-4224 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Waldenstrom, J., Broman, T., Carlsson, I., Hasselquist, D., Achterberg, R. P., Wagenaar, J. A., Olsen, B. (2002). Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter coli in Different Ecological Guilds and Taxa of Migrating Birds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 5911-5917 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Broman, T., Palmgren, H., Bergstrom, S., Sellin, M., Waldenstrom, J., Danielsson-Tham, M.-L., Olsen, B. (2002). Campylobacter jejuni in Black-Headed Gulls (Larus ridibundus): Prevalence, Genotypes, and Influence on C. jejuni Epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4594-4602 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Petersen, L., Nielsen, E. M., Engberg, J., On, S. L. W., Dietz, H. H. (2001). Comparison of Genotypes and Serotypes of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Danish Wild Mammals and Birds and from Broiler Flocks and Humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3115-3121 [Abstract] [Full Text]