AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, D. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mulligan, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, D. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 July; 50(1): 160-162
Copyright © 1985, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Pressate from Peat Dewatering as a Substrate for Bacterial Growth

Catherine N. Mulligan and David G. Cooper*

Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7

ABSTRACT

This study considered the possibility of using water expressed during the drying of fuel-grade peat as a substrate for microbial growth. Highly humified peat pressed for 2.5 min at 1.96 MPa produced water with a chemical oxygen demand of 690 mg/liter. Several biological compounds could be produced by using the organic matter in expressed peat water as a substrate. These included polymers such as chitosan, contained in the cell wall of Rhizopus arrhizus, and two extracellular polysaccharides, xanthan gum and pullulan, produced by Xanthomonas campestris and Aureobasidium pullulans, respectively. A very effective surfactant was produced by Bacillus subtilis grown in the expressed water. Small additions of nutrients to the peat pressate were necessary to obtain substantial yields of products. The addition of peptone, yeast extract, and glucose improved production of the various compounds. Biological treatment improved the quality of the expressed water to the extent that in an industrial process it could be returned to the environment.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 July; 50(1): 160-162
Copyright © 1985, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.