This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Andrews, R E Articles by Bulla, L A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Andrews, R E, Jr Articles by Bulla, L A, Jr Agricola Articles by Andrews, R E Articles by Bulla, L A

Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 October; 50(4): 737-742

Protease activation of the entomocidal protoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki.

R E Andrews Jr, M M Bibilos and L A Bulla Jr

ABSTRACT

Two isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki were examined which produced different levels of intracellular proteases. Although the crystals from both strains had comparable toxicity, one of the strains, LB1, had a strong polypeptide band at 68,000 molecular weight in the protein from the crystal; in the other, HD251, no such band was evident. When the intracellular proteases in both strains were measured, strain HD251 produced less than 10% of the proteolytic activity found in LB1. These proteases were primarily neutral metalloproteases, although low levels of other proteases were detected. In LB1, the synthesis of protease increased as the cells began to sporulate; however, in HD251, protease activity appeared much later in the sporulation cycle. The protease activity in strain LB1 was very high when the cells were making crystal toxin, whereas in HD251 reduced proteolytic activity was present during crystal toxin synthesis. The insecticidal toxin (molecular weight, 68,000) from both strains could be prepared by cleaving the protoxin (molecular weight, 135,000) with trypsin, followed by ion-exchange chromatography. The procedure described gave quantitative recovery of toxic activity, and approximately half of the total protein was recovered. Calculations show that these results correspond to stoichiometric conversion of protoxin to insecticidal toxin. The toxicities of whole crystals, soluble crystal protein, and purified toxin from both strains were comparable.

---

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 October; 50(4): 737-742

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Naimov, S., Boncheva, R., Karlova, R., Dukiandjiev, S., Minkov, I., de Maagd, R. A. (2008). Solubilization, Activation, and Insecticidal Activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Serovar thompsoni HD542 Crystal Proteins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 7145-7151 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kirouac, M., Vachon, V., Quievy, D., Schwartz, J.-L., Laprade, R. (2006). Protease Inhibitors Fail To Prevent Pore Formation by the Activated Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Cry1Aa in Insect Brush Border Membrane Vesicles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 506-515 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Candas, M., Loseva, O., Oppert, B., Kosaraju, P., Bulla, L. A. Jr. (2003). Insect Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: Alterations in the Indianmeal Moth Larval Gut Proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2: 19-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McGaughey, W. H., Whalon, M. E. (1992). Managing Insect Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins. Science 258: 1451-1455 [Abstract]