This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wachenheim, D. E. Articles by Hespell, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wachenheim, D. E. Articles by Hespell, R. B. Agricola Articles by Wachenheim, D. E. Articles by Hespell, R. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 December; 50(6): 1361-1367
Copyright © 1985, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Responses of Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a Ruminal Cellulolytic Species, to Nutrient Starvation

Daniel E. Wachenheim and Robert B. Hespell^,*

Department of Dairy Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

ABSTRACT

Ruminococcus flavefaciens strain C94, a strictly anaerobic, cellulolytic ruminal bacterial species, was grown either in batch or continuous cultures (cellobiose limited or nitrogen limited) at various dilution rates. Washed cell suspensions were incubated anaerobically at 39°C without nutrients for various times up to 24 h. The effects of starvation on direct and viable cell counts, cell composition (DNA, RNA, protein, and carbohydrate), and endogenous production of volatile fatty acids by the cell suspensions were determined. In addition, the effect of the pH of the starvation buffer on direct and viable cell counts was determined. Survival of batch-grown cells during starvation was variable, with an average time for one-half the cells to lose viability (ST₅₀) of 10.9 h. We found with continuous cultures that viable cell counts declined faster when the initial cell suspensions had been grown at faster dilution rates; this effect was more pronounced for suspensions that had been limited by cellobiose (ST₅₀ = 6.6 h at a dilution rate of 0.33 h^–1) than for suspensions that had been limited by nitrogen (ST₅₀ = 9.5 h at a dilution rate of 0.33 h^–1). With continuous cultures, viable cell counts in all cases declined faster than direct cell counts did. The rates of disappearance of specific cell components during starvation varied with the initial growth conditions, but could not be correlated with the loss of viability. Volatile fatty acid production by starving cells was very low, and acetate was the main product. Starved cells survived longer at pH 7.0 than they did at pH 5.5, and this effect of pH was greater for cellobiose-limited cells (mean ST₅₀ = 7.1 h) than for nitrogen-limited cells (mean ST₅₀ = 12 h). Although it has relatively low ST₅₀ values, R. flavefaciens has sufficient survival abilities to maintain reasonable numbers in domestic animals having maintenance or greater feed intake.

^* Corresponding author.

Present address: Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY 14650.

Present address: Northern Regional Research Center, Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Peoria, IL 61604.