AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isa, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Verstraete, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isa, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Verstraete, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Isa, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Verstraete, W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 March; 51(3): 580-587
Copyright © 1986, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Sulfate Reduction Relative to Methane Production in High-Rate Anaerobic Digestion: Microbiological Aspects

Zaid Isa, Stéphane Grusenmeyer and Willy Verstraete*

Laboratory of Microbial Ecology, State University of Ghent, Coupure L 653, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

ABSTRACT

In the high-rate anaerobic reactors studied (ca. 10 g of chemical oxygen demand [COD] removed per liter of reactor per day), the sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) were poor competitors of methane-producing bacteria (MPB), scavenging only on the order of 10 to 20% of the total electron flow. The relatively noncompetitive nature of the SRB in this type of reactor is in sharp contrast to the tendency of the SRB to dominate in natural environments and in other types of anaerobic digesters. Various factors such as the feedback inhibition of H2S on the SRB, iron limitation, the origin of the SRB inocula, biokinetics, and thermodynamics were investigated. The outcome of the SRB-MPB competition under the reactor conditions studied appeared to be particularly determined by two factors. The SRB, as predicted by the Vmax-Km kinetics, competed most effectively at low substrate levels (<0.5 g of COD per liter). The MPB, however, appeared to colonize and adhere much more effectively to the polyurethane carrier matrix present in the reactor, thus compensating for the apparent lower growth rates. Even if the reactor was initially allowed to be predominantly colonized by SRB, the MPB could regain dominance.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 March; 51(3): 580-587
Copyright © 1986, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.