This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wikner, J. Articles by Hagström, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wikner, J. Articles by Hagström, A. Agricola Articles by Wikner, J. Articles by Hagström, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 July; 52(1): 4-8
Copyright © 1986, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Use of Genetically Marked Minicells as a Probe in Measurement of Predation on Bacteria in Aquatic Environments

Department of Microbiology, University of Umeå, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Minicells produced by Escherichia coli M2141 were used as probes to measure predation on pelagic bacteria in situ. The minicells, labeled with [³⁵S]methionine in one specific protein, were shown to disappear in the presence of a microflagellate (Ochromonas sp.), as seen by a decrease in the amount of labeled marker protein with time. Incubation in filtered (pore size, 0.2 µm) and autoclaved seawater did not affect the amount of labeled marker protein in the minicell. The generation time of flagellates feeding on minicells was determined to be similar to that found for flagellates grown on seawater bacteria or living E. coli NC3. Data indicate that minicells are seen as true food particles by the flagellates. The minicell probe was used in recapture experiments, in which predation in situ on pelagic bacteria was demonstrated. The rate of bacterial production showed a clear covariation with the rate of predation, both in different sea areas and in depth profiles. The obtained results (11 field experiments) showed that the rate of predation, on average, accounts for the consumption of 62% of the bacteria produced.

^* Corresponding author.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kiorboe, T., Tang, K., Grossart, H.-P., Ploug, H. (2003). Dynamics of Microbial Communities on Marine Snow Aggregates: Colonization, Growth, Detachment, and Grazing Mortality of Attached Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 3036-3047 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zubkov, M. V., Sleigh, M. A., Burkill, P. H., Leakey, R. J.G. (2000). Bacterial growth and grazing loss in contrasting areas of North and South Atlantic. J PLANKTON RES 22: 685-711 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• González, J. M. (1999). Bacterivory Rate Estimates and Fraction of Active Bacterivores in Natural Protist Assemblages from Aquatic Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 1463-1469 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kinner, N. E., Harvey, R. W., Blakeslee, K., Novarino, G., Meeker, L. D. (1998). Size-Selective Predation on Groundwater Bacteria by Nanoflagellates in an Organic-Contaminated Aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 618-625 [Abstract] [Full Text]