This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tugel, J. B. Articles by Jones, G. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tugel, J. B. Articles by Jones, G. E. Agricola Articles by Tugel, J. B. Articles by Jones, G. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 November; 52(5): 1167-1172
Copyright © 1986, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Microbial Iron Reduction by Enrichment Cultures Isolated from Estuarine Sediments

Joyce B. Tugel, Mark E. Hines^,* and Galen E. Jones

Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824

ABSTRACT

Microbial Fe reduction in acetate- and succinate-containing enrichment cultures initiated with an estuarine sediment inoculum was studied. Fe reduction was unaffected when SO₄^2– reduction was inhibited by MoO₄^2–, indicating that both processes could occur independently. Bacterially produced sulfide precipitated as FeS but was not completely responsible for Fe reduction. The separation of oxidized Fe particles from bacteria by dialysis tubing demonstrated that direct bacterial contact was necessary for Fe reduction. Fe reduction in cultures amended with NO₃^– was delayed until NO₃^– and NO₂^– were removed. However, bacterial attachment to oxidized Fe particles in NO₃^–-amended cultures occurred early during growth in a manner similar to NO₃^–-free cultures. During late stages of growth, bacteria not attached to Fe particles became pale and swollen, while attached cells remained bright blue when examined by 4',6-diamidine-2-phenylindole epifluo-rescence microscopy. The presence of added oxidized Mn had no effect on Fe reduction. The results suggested that enzymatic Fe reduction was responsible for reducing Fe in these cultures even in the presence of sulfide and that cells incapable of Fe reduction became unhealthy when Fe(III) was the only available electron acceptor.

^* Corresponding author.

Present address: Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.

Jackson Estuarine Laboratory Contribution Series No. 199.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nevin, K. P., Lovley, D. R. (2000). Lack of Production of Electron-Shuttling Compounds or Solubilization of Fe(III) during Reduction of Insoluble Fe(III) Oxide by Geobacter metallireducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2248-2251 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Caccavo, F. Jr. (1999). Protein-Mediated Adhesion of the Dissimilatory Fe(III)-Reducing Bacterium Shewanella alga BrY to Hydrous Ferric Oxide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 5017-5022 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• King, G. M., Garey, M. A. (1999). Ferric Iron Reduction by Bacteria Associated with the Roots of Freshwater and Marine Macrophytes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 4393-4398 [Abstract] [Full Text]