AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caso, J L
Right arrow Articles by Suárez, J E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caso, J L
Right arrow Articles by Suárez, J E
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Caso, J L
Right arrow Articles by Suárez, J E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 October; 53(10): 2544-2547

Transfection in Micromonospora spp.

J L Caso, C Hardisson and J E Suárez

Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Oviedo, Spain.

ABSTRACT

The introduction of bacteriophage DNA into Micromonospora protoplasts, resulting in the production of infective viral progeny, is reported. Transfection was affected by several factors. We observed that it reached a maximum when protoplasts from young mycelium (15 h old) were used. Maximum transfection took place when polyethylene glycol (PEG) was added to the mixtures at a final concentration of 20% (vol/vol) and did not occur at PEG concentrations under 10% or over 35%. The addition of positively charged liposomes to the mixtures was essential, since no transfectants were detected in the absence of liposomes at any PEG concentration. When DNA was present in nonlimiting amounts, a maximum efficiency of around 10(-3) to 10(-4) PFU per protoplast was obtained. The efficiency per DNA molecule showed a constant value of around 10(-4) to 10(-5) PFU, but the data suggest that transfection could be achieved by a single DNA molecule. The method proved to be equally efficient for the DNAs of at least five Micromonospora bacteriophages. On the contrary, we failed to transfect five of seven Micromonospora strains. These data suggest that only a minor subpopulation of protoplasts is competent and that the main factors influencing the transfection of Micromonospora protoplasts are neither the characteristics nor the origin of the DNA but the properties and status of the protoplasts.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 October; 53(10): 2544-2547







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.