This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Santiago-Mercado, J Articles by Hazen, T C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Santiago-Mercado, J Articles by Hazen, T C Agricola Articles by Santiago-Mercado, J Articles by Hazen, T C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 December; 53(12): 2922-2928

Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration in tropical waters.

Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras 00931.

ABSTRACT

Four membrane filter methods for the enumeration of fecal coliforms were compared for accuracy, specificity, and recovery. Water samples were taken several times from 13 marine, 1 estuarine, and 4 freshwater sites around Puerto Rico, from pristine waters and waters receiving treated and untreated sewage and effluent from a tuna cannery and a rum distillery. Differences of 1 to 3 orders of magnitude in the levels of fecal coliforms were observed in some samples by different recovery techniques. Marine water samples gave poorer results, in terms of specificity, selectivity, and comparability, than freshwater samples for all four fecal coliform methods used. The method using Difco m-FC agar with a resuscitation step gave the best overall results; however, even this method gave higher false-positive error, higher undetected-target error, lower selectivity, and higher recovery of nontarget organisms than the method using MacConkey membrane broth, the worst method for temperate waters. All methods tested were unacceptable for the enumeration of fecal coliforms in tropical fresh and marine waters. Thus, considering the high densities of fecal coliforms observed at most sites in Puerto Rico by all these methods, it would seem that these density estimates are, in many cases, grossly overestimating the degree of recent fecal contamination. Since Escherichia coli appears to be a normal inhabitant of tropical waters, fecal contamination may be indicated when none is present. Using fecal coliforms as an indicator is grossly inadequate for the detection of recent human fecal contamination and associated pathogens in both marine and fresh tropical waters.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Byamukama, D., Mach, R. L., Kansiime, F., Manafi, M., Farnleitner, A. H. (2005). Discrimination Efficacy of Fecal Pollution Detection in Different Aquatic Habitats of a High-Altitude Tropical Country, Using Presumptive Coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Clostridium perfringens Spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 65-71 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Chao, K.-K., Chao, C.-C., Chao, W.-L. (2004). Evaluation of Colilert-18 for Detection of Coliforms and Eschericha coli in Subtropical Freshwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 1242-1244 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Byamukama, D., Kansiime, F., Mach, R. L., Farnleitner, A. H. (2000). Determination of Escherichia coli Contamination with Chromocult Coliform Agar Showed a High Level of Discrimination Efficiency for Differing Fecal Pollution Levels in Tropical Waters of Kampala, Uganda. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 864-868 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Solo-Gabriele, H. M., Wolfert, M. A., Desmarais, T. R., Palmer, C. J. (2000). Sources of Escherichia coli in a Coastal Subtropical Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 230-237 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Griffin, D. W., Gibson, C. J. III, Lipp, E. K., Riley, K., Paul, J. H. III, Rose, J. B. (1999). Detection of Viral Pathogens by Reverse Transcriptase PCR and of Microbial Indicators by Standard Methods in the Canals of the Florida Keys. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 4118-4125 [Abstract] [Full Text]