AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntire, W S
Right arrow Articles by Weyler, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIntire, W S
Right arrow Articles by Weyler, W
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McIntire, W S
Right arrow Articles by Weyler, W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 September; 53(9): 2183-2188

Factors affecting the production of pyrroloquinoline quinone by the methylotrophic bacterium W3A1.

W S McIntire and W Weyler

Molecular Biology Division, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121.

ABSTRACT

Two variants of the methylotrophic bacterium W3A1, designated W3A1-S (slimy) and W3A1-NS (nonslimy), were compared with respect to their ability to grow in batch culture on the C1 substrates methylamine, methanol, and trimethylamine. Substrate utilization, cell density, pH, cellular and soluble polysaccharide production, and concentrations of the enzymes methylamine dehydrogenase, trimethylamine dehydrogenase, and methanol dehydrogenase produced were measured as a function of growth. The ability of the two bacterial variants to excrete the redox cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone into the growth medium was also investigated. The two variants were similar with respect to all properties measured, except that W3A1-S produced significantly more capsular polysaccharides than variant W3A1-NS. Pyrroloquinoline quinone was excreted when either variant was grown on any of the C1 substrates investigated but was maximally produced when the methylamine concentration was 0.45% (wt/vol). This cofactor is excreted only as bacterial growth enters the stationary phase, a time when the levels of trimethylamine dehydrogenase and the quinoproteins methanol dehydrogenase and methylamine dehydrogenase begin to decline. It is not known whether the pyrroloquinoline quinone found in the medium is made de novo for excretion, derived from the quinoprotein pool, or both. Pyrroloquinoline quinone excretion has been observed with other methylotrophs, but this is the first instance where the excretion was observed with substrates other than methanol.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 September; 53(9): 2183-2188




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.