AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newbold, C J
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newbold, C J
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, A J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Newbold, C J
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, A J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 February; 54(2): 544-547

Effect of the novel ionophore tetronasin (ICI 139603) on ruminal microorganisms.

C J Newbold, R J Wallace, N D Watt and A J Richardson

Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT

The antimicrobial activity of the novel ionophore tetronasin (formerly ICI 139603) was compared with that of monensin for the growth of ruminal bacteria, protozoa, and an anaerobic fungus. The potency of tetronasin toward most bacteria and the fungus was an order of magnitude or more greater than that of monensin. Lactobacillus casei was 55 times more sensitive to tetronasin than to monensin, indicating a potential role for tetronasin in reversing lactic acidosis. Bacteria with a gram-positive ultrastructure were generally sensitive to the ionophores and unable to adapt to grow in their presence. The exception was the cellulolytic Ruminococcus flavefaciens, which adapted during successive cultivation on media with increasing ionophore concentrations to grow at 100-fold higher concentrations of tetronasin than were initially lethal to the organism. Gram-negative bacteria were more resistant and generally able to adapt to grow in the presence of both ionophores. An in vivo trial with cattle and in vitro growth experiments indicated that the effect of tetronasin on ciliate protozoa was minor. In vitro experiments measuring hydrogen production by Neocallimastix frontalis suggested that this fungus would be unable to survive in ruminants receiving tetronasin.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 February; 54(2): 544-547




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.