This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linkfield, T G
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linkfield, T G
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J M
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Linkfield, T G
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 November; 55(11): 2773-2778

Characterization of the acclimation period before anaerobic dehalogenation of halobenzoates.

T G Linkfield, J M Suflita and J M Tiedje

Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1325.

ABSTRACT

The acclimation periods prior to detectable dehalogenation of halogenated benzoates in anaerobic lake sediments ranged from 3 weeks to 6 months. These acclimation periods were reproducible over time and among sampling sites and were characteristic of the chemical tested. The lengthy acclimation period appears to represent an induction phase in which little or no aryl dehalogenation is observed, followed by an exponential increase in activity typical of an enrichment response. Continuous growth from the time of the first exposure to the chemical is inconsistent with the extremely low per-cell activities estimated for the early days of the acclimation period and the fact that the dehalogenation yields no carbon to support microbial growth. The finding of a characteristic acclimation time for each chemical argues against nutritional deficiency, inhibition, or predation as an explanation for this phase of metabolism, while the reproducibility of the findings with time and space and among replicates argues against genetic changes as the explanation. The acclimation times did correlate with the eventual dehalogenation rates. This may reflect the general energy limitations in the anaerobic communities and suggests that those chemicals with faster dehalogenation rates provide more energy for the induction and growth phases of the active population.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 November; 55(11): 2773-2778




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Becker, J. G., Berardesco, G., Rittmann, B. E., Stahl, D. A. (2006). Effects of Endogenous Substrates on Adaptation of Anaerobic Microbial Communities to 3-Chlorobenzoate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 449-456 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • D'Angelo, E. M., Reddy, K.R. (2000). Aerobic and Anaerobic Transformations of Pentachlorophenol in Wetland Soils. Soil Sci. 64: 933-943 [Abstract] [Full Text]