This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walker, S G Articles by Bailey, G W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Walker, S G Articles by Bailey, G W Agricola Articles by Walker, S G Articles by Bailey, G W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 November; 55(11): 2976-2984

Physicochemical interaction of Escherichia coli cell envelopes and Bacillus subtilis cell walls with two clays and ability of the composite to immobilize heavy metals from solution.

S G Walker, C A Flemming, F G Ferris, T J Beveridge and G W Bailey

Department of Microbiology, College of Biological Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Isolated Escherichia coli K-12 cell envelopes or Bacillus subtilis 168 cell walls were reacted with smectite or kaolinite clay in distilled deionized water (pH 6.0); unbound envelopes or walls were separated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, and the extent of adsorption was calculated. At saturation, both clays adsorbed approximately 1.0 mg (dry weight) of envelopes or walls per mg (dry weight) of clay. Clays showed a preference for edge-on orientation with both walls and envelopes, which was indicative of an aluminum polynuclear bridging mechanism between the wall or envelope surface and the clay edge. The addition of heavy metals increased the incidence of planar surface orientations, which suggested that multivalent metal cation bridging was coming into play and was of increasing importance. The metal-binding capacity of isolated envelopes, walls, clays, and envelope-clay or wall-clay mixtures was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy after exposure to aqueous 5.0 mM Ag+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cr3+ nitrate salt solutions at pHs determined by the buffering capacity of wall, envelope, clay, or composite system. The order of metal uptake was walls greater than envelopes greater than smectite clay greater than kaolinite clay for the individual components, and walls plus smectite greater than walls plus kaolinite greater than envelopes plus smectite greater than envelopes plus kaolinite for the mixtures. On a dry-weight basis, the envelope-clay and wall-clay mixtures bound 20 to 90% less metal than equal amounts of the individual components did.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

---

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 November; 55(11): 2976-2984

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Southam, G., Saunders, J. A. (2005). The Geomicrobiology of Ore Deposits. Economic Geology 100: 1067-1084 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Douglas, S. (2005). Mineralogical footprints of microbial life. ajs 305: 503-525 [Abstract] [Full Text]