This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G W
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K
Right arrow Articles by Tannock, G W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 February; 55(2): 279-283

Colonization of the porcine gastrointestinal tract by lactobacilli.

K Pedersen and G W Tannock

Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

ABSTRACT

Eight strains of lactobacillus isolated from the porcine gastrointestinal tract were tested for their ability to adhere in vitro to cells collected from stratified squamous epithelium in the digestive tracts of newborn piglets. Piglets were inoculated with individual strains, and their digestive tracts were sampled at intervals to determine the colonizing ability of the lactobacilli. The results of the in vitro test did not predict whether a lactobacillus strain would associate with stratified squamous epithelium in the piglet digestive tract, but epithelial association in vivo appeared to be an important factor in the maintenance of lactobacillus populations in the tract. None of the lactobacillus strains used as inocula was numerically dominant in the tract 7 days after inoculation of the piglets with a single dose of the bacteria.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 February; 55(2): 279-283




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Denou, E., Berger, B., Barretto, C., Panoff, J.-M., Arigoni, F., Brussow, H. (2007). Gene Expression of Commensal Lactobacillus johnsonii Strain NCC533 during In Vitro Growth and in the Murine Gut. J. Bacteriol. 189: 8109-8119 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gardiner, G. E., Casey, P. G., Casey, G., Lynch, P. B., Lawlor, P. G., Hill, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., Stanton, C., Ross, R. P. (2004). Relative Ability of Orally Administered Lactobacillus murinus To Predominate and Persist in the Porcine Gastrointestinal Tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 1895-1906 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simpson, J. M., McCracken, V. J., Gaskins, H. R., Mackie, R. I. (2000). Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplicons To Monitor Changes in Fecal Bacterial Populations of Weaning Pigs after Introduction of Lactobacillus reuteri Strain MM53. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 4705-4714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pascual, M., Hugas, M., Badiola, J. I., Monfort, J. M., Garriga, M. (1999). Lactobacillus salivarius CTC2197 Prevents Salmonella enteritidis Colonization in Chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 4981-4986 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McGrady, J.A., Butcher, W.G., Beighton, D., Switalski, L.M. (1995). Specific and Charge Interactions Mediate Collagen Recognition by Oral Lactobacilli. JDR 74: 649-657 [Abstract]