This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tatton, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tatton, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tatton, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 February; 55(2): 440-445
Copyright © 1989, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Methanogenesis from Ethanol by Defined Mixed Continuous Cultures

Marcus J. Tatton, David B. Archer*, Godfrey E. Powell and Mary L. Parker

Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute of Food Research, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

Methanogenesis from ethanol by defined mixed continuous cultures was studied. Under sulfate-free conditions, a Desulfovibrio strain was used as the ethanol-degrading species producing acetic acid and hydrogen. In a two-membered mutualistic coculture, the hydrogen was converted to methane by a Methanobacterium sp. and pH was maintained at neutrality by the addition of alkali. Introduction of a third species, the acetate-utilizing Methanosarcina mazei, obviated the need for external pH control. Methanogenesis by the co-and triculture was studied at various dilution rates in the steady state. The mutualistic coculture performed like a composite single species, as predicted from the theory of mutualistic interactions. Coupling between the mutualistic coculture and the acetate-utilizing methanogen was less tight. Increasing the dilution rate destabilized the triculture; at low dilution rates, instability was soon recovered, but at higher dilution rates imbalance between the rates of production and removal of acetic acid led to a drop in pH. Flocs formed in the triculture. An annulus of the Methanobacterium sp. and Desulfovibrio sp. was retained around the Methanosarcina sp. by strands of material probably derived from the Methanosarcina sp.


FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 February; 55(2): 440-445
Copyright © 1989, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.