This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, R G
Right arrow Articles by Bunning, V K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, R G
Right arrow Articles by Bunning, V K
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, R G
Right arrow Articles by Bunning, V K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 June; 55(6): 1490-1494

Comparative recovery of uninjured and heat-injured Listeria monocytogenes cells from bovine milk.

R G Crawford, C M Beliveau, J T Peeler, C W Donnelly and V K Bunning

Division of Microbiology, Food and Drug Administration, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.

ABSTRACT

The standard selective enrichment protocols of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) were compared with an experimental nonselective broth enrichment (NSB) protocol and variations of the standard cold-enrichment (CE) protocol for the recovery of heat-injured Listeria monocytogenes. Bacterial cells (10(7)/ml) were suspended in sterile milk and heated at 71.7 degrees C in a slug-flow heat exchanger for holding times ranging from 1 to 30 s. Surviving cells were determined (50% endpoint) by the given protocols, and the following D values were obtained: NSB, D = 2.0 +/- 0.5 s; FDA, D = 1.4 +/- 0.3 s; USDA, D = 0.6 +/- 0.2 s; CE, D less than or equal to 1.2 s. The respective direct-plating media used in these enrichments were also analyzed for recovery, and the following D values were calculated from the enumeration of surviving cells; NSB, D = 2.7 +/- 0.8 s; FDA, D = 1.3 +/- 0.4 s; USDA, D = 0.7 +/- 0.2 s. The low levels of heat-injured L. monocytogenes cells which were detected at inactivation endpoints on the optimal nonselective media (25 degrees C for 7 days) failed to recover and multiply during experimental CEs (4 degrees C for 28 days). Initial inactivation experiments in which raw whole milk was used as the heating menstruum gave much lower recoveries with all protocols. The detectable limits for uninjured cells that were suspended in raw milk were similar (0.35 to 3.2 cells per ml) for the standard CE, FDA, and USDA protocols.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 June; 55(6): 1490-1494




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dupont, C., Augustin, J.-C. (2009). Influence of Stress on Single-Cell Lag Time and Growth Probability for Listeria monocytogenes in Half Fraser Broth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3069-3076 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rowan, N. J., Anderson, J. G. (1998). Effects of Above-Optimum Growth Temperature and Cell Morphology on Thermotolerance of Listeria monocytogenes Cells Suspended in Bovine Milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 2065-2071 [Abstract] [Full Text]