AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pipke, R
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, D F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pipke, R
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, D F
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pipke, R
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, D F

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 April; 58(4): 1259-1265

Survival and function of a genetically engineered Pseudomonad in aquatic sediment microcosms.

R Pipke, I Wagner-Döbler, K N Timmis and D F Dwyer

Molecular Microbial Ecology Group, Department of Microbiology, National Research Center for Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany.

ABSTRACT

Pseudomonas sp. strain B13 FR1(pFRC20P) is a genetically engineered microorganism (GEM) which is able to degrade chloro- and methylaromatics through a constructed ortho cleavage pathway. The fate of the GEM and its ability to degrade substituted aromatic compounds in two different aquatic sediments was investigated by using a microcosm system which consisted of intact layered sediment cores with an overlying water column. The GEM survived in Lake Plussee and in Rhine river sediments at densities of approximately 10(5) bacteria per g (dry weight) (1 to 5% of the total CFU) throughout a 4-week period of investigation. According to several criteria, the microcosm system was stable and healthy throughout the experiment and the addition of the GEM did not affect the total number of extractable CFU (I. Wagner-Döbler, R. Pipke, K. N. Timmis, and D. F. Dwyer, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:1249-1258, 1992). When compared with uninoculated controls, the presence of the GEM enhanced the rate of degradation of a mixture of 3-chlorobenzoate and 4-methylbenzoate (25 microns each) which had been added to the water column of the sediment cores.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 April; 58(4): 1259-1265




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.