AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by el-Din Sharabi, N
Right arrow Articles by Bartha, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by el-Din Sharabi, N
Right arrow Articles by Bartha, R
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by el-Din Sharabi, N
Right arrow Articles by Bartha, R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 April; 59(4): 1201-1205

Testing of some assumptions about biodegradability in soil as measured by carbon dioxide evolution.

N el-Din Sharabi and R Bartha

Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0231.

ABSTRACT

Conversion to CO2 upon incubation in aerobic soil is one of the standard test procedures to assess biodegradability. It may be measured with unlabeled test compounds in biometer flasks. In this case, the background CO2 evolution by unamended soil is subtracted from the CO2 evolution by the amended soil and the resulting net CO2 evolution becomes the measure of biodegradation. Alternately, 14CO2 release from radiocarbon substrates is measured to assess biodegradability. Both approaches measure ultimate (complete) biodegradation and bypass the theoretical and technical limitations of residue analysis. This report examines the underlying assumptions that, except for carbon content, conversion percentage to CO2 is relatively independent of chemical composition, that CO2 production is proportional to the amount of added test compound, and that the background CO2 evolution of the soil is not influenced by the test substance. Work with unlabeled and radiolabeled substrates proved the first two assumptions to be essentially correct. However, more than half of net CO2 production may represent the mineralization of biomass and soil organic matter, some of it unrelated to the test compound. The soil microbial community in its nongrowing steady state appears to convert a much lower percentage of a radiocarbon substrate to 14CO2 than a growing soil community that responds to a substantial substrate addition. These findings may help to improve test methods and may aid in the interpretation of test results.


Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 April; 59(4): 1201-1205







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.