AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Kuppeveld, F J
Right arrow Articles by Melchers, W J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Kuppeveld, F J
Right arrow Articles by Melchers, W J
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van Kuppeveld, F J
Right arrow Articles by Melchers, W J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 January; 60(1): 149-152

Detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by a mycoplasma group-specific PCR.

F J van Kuppeveld, K E Johansson, J M Galama, J Kissing, G Bölske, J T van der Logt and W J Melchers

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

ABSTRACT

The suitability of a 16S rRNA-based mycoplasma group-specific PCR for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures was investigated. A total of 104 cell cultures were tested by using microbiological culture, DNA fluorochrome staining, DNA-rRNA hybridization, and PCR techniques. A comparison of the results obtained with these techniques revealed agreement for 95 cell cultures. Discrepant results, which were interpreted as false negative or false positive on the basis of a comparison with the results obtained with other methods, were observed with nine cell cultures. The microbiological culture technique produced false-negative results for four cell cultures. The hybridization technique produced false-negative results for two cell cultures, and for one of these cell cultures the DNA staining technique also produced a false-negative result. The PCR may have produced false-positive results for one cell culture. Ambiguous results were obtained with the remaining two cell cultures. Furthermore, the presence of contaminating bacteria interfered with the interpretation of the DNA staining results for 16 cell cultures. For the same reason the hybridization signals of nine cell cultures could not be interpreted. Our results demonstrate the drawbacks of each of the detection methods and the suitability of the PCR for the detection of mycoplasmas in cell cultures.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 January; 60(1): 149-152




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.